I will be somewhat upgrading and reposting this from 2012 as the conventional media have guaranteed really people that are few the information for the “case” against Julian Assange in Sweden. The UN performing Group ruled that Assange ought not to have already been arrested in britain in the beginning since there is no instance, with no genuine research. Check this out and you also shall understand why.
One other thing perhaps not commonly recognized can there be isn’t any JURY in a rape test in Sweden and it’s also a SECRET TEST. Most of the proof, most of the witnesses, are heard in secret. No public, no jury, no media. Really the only part that is public the charging and also the verdict. There clearly was a judge as well as 2 advisers straight appointed by political events. So that you never ever would get to comprehend just just just how clearly the situation is just a stitch-up. Unless you check this out.
You can find therefore numerous inconsistencies in Anna Ardin’s accusation of intimate attack against Julian Assange. However the key question which leaps away at me – and which strangely i’ve not seen asked any place else – is this:
Why did Anna Ardin not alert Sofia Wilen?
On 16 August, Julian Assange had intercourse with Sofia Wilen. Sofia had become understood into the group that is swedish Assange for the shocking red cashmere sweater she had used right in front row of Assange’s press seminar. Anna Ardin knew Assange ended up being about to have intercourse with Sofia Wilen. On 17 August, Ardin texted a buddy who had been trying to find Assange:
“He’s maybe maybe not right here. He’s planned to possess intercourse using the cashmere woman every night, not managed to get. Perhaps he finally discovered time yesterday? ”
Yet Ardin later testified that simply three days earlier in the day, on 13 August, she have been intimately assaulted by Assange; an assault therefore serious she ended up being happy to take to (with great success) to ruin Julian Assange’s entire life. She has also been to convey that this attack included enforced non-safe sex and she had been concerned with HIV.
If Ardin actually thought that on 13 August Assange had forced non-safe sex on her and also this may have sent HIV, why did she make no try to alert Sofia Wilen that Wilen was at threat of her life? And just why ended up being Ardin speaking about with Assange his desire for intercourse m.privatecams with Wilen, and texting about any of it to buddies, without any disapproval that is evident discouragement?
Ardin had Wilen’s contact information and even had organised her enrollment for the press meeting. She could have warned her. But she didn’t.
Why don’t we fit that into a tremendously brief survey regarding the entire Ardin/Assange relationship.
11 August: Assange comes in Stockholm for the press meeting organised with a branch associated with Social Democratic Party. Anna Ardin has provided her one sleep flat for him in which to stay as she’s going to be away.
13 August: Ardin comes home early. She’s got supper with Assange as well as have actually consensual intercourse, regarding the day that is first of. Ardin afterwards alleges this changed into attack by surreptitious mutilation of this condom.
14 August: Anna volunteers to do something as Julian’s press assistant. She sits close to him in the dais at their press meeting. Assange satisfies Sofia Wilen here.
‘Julian wants to visit a crayfish party, anybody have a few available seats tonight or tomorrow? #fb’
This try to find a crayfish celebration fails, therefore Ardin organises one herself for him, in a yard outside her flat. Anna and Julian appear good together. One visitor hears Anna rib Assange that she thought “you had dumped me” as he got up from bed early that morning. Another proposes to Anna that Julian can keep her flat and come stick to them. She replies: “He can stick to me personally. ”
15 August Nevertheless in the party that is crayfish Julian, Anna tweets:
‘Sitting in the open air at 02:00 and barely freezing using the world’s coolest smartest people, it’s amazing! #fb’
Julian and Anna, in accordance with both their authorities testimonies, rest once again in identical bed that is single and continue doing therefore for the following day or two. Assange tells police they continue steadily to have intercourse; Anna tells police they don’t. That night, Anna and Julian get together to, and then leave together from, a dinner because of the leadership for the Pirate Party. They again sleep into the exact same sleep.
16 August: Julian would go to have intercourse with Sofia Wilen: Ardin doesn’t alert her of prospective intimate attack. Another buddy provides Anna to dominate housing Julian. Anna again declines.
20 August: After Sofia Wilen contacts her to say she actually is focused on STD’s including HIV after unsafe sex with Julian, Anna takes her to see Anna’s buddy, other personal Democrat user, previous colleague for a passing fancy ballot in a council election, and campaigning feminist police, Irmeli Krans. Ardin informs Wilen the authorities can compel Assange to just simply just take an HIV test. Ardin sits in throughout Wilen’s that is unrecorded breach of procedure – police meeting. Krans makes a declaration Assange that is accusing of. Wilen will not signal it.
21 August Having heard Wilen’s meeting and Krans’ statement from this, Ardin makes her very own authorities declaration alleging Assange has surreptiously had non-safe sex with her eight times formerly.
Some days later on: Ardin creates a broken condom into the police as proof; however a forensic assessment discovers no traces of Assange’s – or anyone else’s – DNA it is apparently unused on it, and indeed.
No witness has arrived ahead to express that Ardin complained of intimate attack by Assange before Wilen’s Ardin-arranged meeting with Krans – and Wilen arrived ahead not to ever whine of an attack, but check into STDs. Wilen declined to signal the declaration rape that is alleging that was drafted by Ardin’s friend Krans in Ardin’s existence.
Therefore ordinary this one of a few things occurred:
Ardin ended up being intimately assaulted with unsafe sex, but didn’t alert Wilen whenever she knew Assange would definitely see her in hope of intercourse.
Ardin also proceeded to host Assange, assist him, come in general general public and personal with him, work as his press secretary, and rest in identical sleep with him, refusing duplicated provides to accommodate him elsewhere, all after he assaulted her.
Ardin desired intercourse with Assange – from whatever motive. She “unexpectedly” returned home early after providing him the utilization of her one sleep flat while she ended up being away. By her very own admission, she had consensual intercourse with him, within hours of fulfilling him.
She discussed with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and seems at the very least to not have been discouraging. Hearing of Wilen’s concern about HIV after unsafe sex, she took Wilen to her campaigning friend that is feminist policewoman Irmeli Krans, to be able to twist Wilen’s tale into a sexual assault – quite easy provided Sweden’s astonishing “second-wave feminism” rape legislation. Wilen declined to signal.
During the authorities station on 20 August, Wilen texted a pal at 14.25 “did not require to place any fees against JA nevertheless the authorities wished to get a handle on him. ”
At 17.26 she texted that she had been “shocked when they arrested JA because we just desired him to have a test”.
The next night at 22.22 she texted “it had been the authorities whom fabricated the charges”.
Ardin then comprised her very own tale of intimate attack. As a lot of buddies knew she had been making love with Assange, she could maybe perhaps maybe not claim non-consensual intercourse. Therefore she manufactured her tale to squeeze in with Wilen’s issues by alleging the event of this condom that is torn. However the condom that is torn produced does not have any trace of Assange upon it. It’s impractical to wear a condom and never keep a DNA trace.
No difficulty is had by me in stating that I securely think Ardin to be always a liar. On her behalf story to be real involves acceptance of behavior that is, within the literal feeling, amazing.
Ardin’s tale is needless to say extremely poor, but that doesn’t matter. Firstly, you’re never ever expected to see all this work detail. Rape trials in Sweden take place completely in key. There isn’t any jury, while the national federal federal government appointed judge is flanked by assessors appointed straight by governmental events. If Assange would go to Sweden, he can disappear completely into prison, the test would be key, in addition to the next thing you may hear is the fact that he could be bad and a rapist.
Secondly, needless to say, no matter the data is indeed weak, as merely to cry rape is always to tarnish a reputation that is man’s. Anna Ardin has recently succeeded in destroying a lot of the ongoing work and life of Assange. The main points associated with story being pathetic is unimportant.
By crying rape, politically proper opinion falls in behind the line it is wrong also to check out evidence. If you should be maybe not permitted to understand whom the accuser is, how will you learn that she worked with CIA-funded anti-Castro teams in Havana and Miami?
Finally, to those helpful idiots whom declare that how you can test these issues is in court, I would personally state needless to say, you might be appropriate, we ought to trust hawaii constantly, fit-ups never happen, and we also should definitely condemn the behaviour that is disgraceful of whom campaigned when it comes to Birmingham Six.